Multi-touch, Apple, And The Future Of Computing.

By now most people are aware of what multi-touch is. The uber-popular iPhone has put multi-touch in the everyday consumer market. With different companies vying for their share of the lucrative technology, it becomes more and more pertinent in every day life.
I’m sure most of Desktop Vibes readers will remember the popular video on youtube, where Jeff Han demonstrated the early prototypes of his multi-touch concept. The video is still incredibly impressive, regardless of its age, and Jeff hasn’t stopped there. He now runs Perceptive Pixel, which focuses on his multi-touch software. Seriously, check it out. You’ll be amazed.
Mainstream Use
This is all great but how will it affect the future? I don’t think I need to outline the incredible uses for multi-touch units, but this could make for some major advancements in a plethora of different fields. Most recently: CNN used Jeff Han’s multi-touch technology to explain the elections. The already popular concept has now reached prime time TV. There’s no denying this is the future.
I would be amiss if I didn’t mention the cow-sized Microsoft Surface. This obviously puts Microsoft in the bid for dominating the competition, but it won’t be easy. Simply put, the device is too big, too expensive and will only make it into the hands of mainstream businesses with a lot of cash to drop on new technology. This leaves the consumer market hanging.
Apple’s Part
Apple arguably sparked and controls the multi-touch market with the launch of the iPhone. On release, Apple set off a chain reaction of bad imitators and crappy phones. By using the already successful OS X and a revolutionary phone, Apple set foot into something that even they might not have realized.
To be honest, I think Apple is fully aware of what they have on their hands…the key to putting multi-touch devices into the hands of the every day consumer. They’ve already made the first steps with the iPhone and iPod touch, along with the multi-touch trackpads on its laptop line. With how polished and capable the Leopard operating system is, Apple has an incredible foundation for a multi-touch computer.
The Future
Apple has a choice to make: how to go about changing the way computers are used. The tried and true method of mouse and keyboard is accepted worldwide, and there will be plenty who will oppose multi-touch. But why let go of something so tactile? To put it plainly, I’m game.
Imagine what a university could accomplish with Xserve and multi-touch capable Macs. Graphs in math could be drawn and manipulated by hand, atoms could be observed in labs, medical students could play with virtual body parts, all done on multi-touch displays. I could continue for hours; the possibilities really are endless. Not to mention, Apple already has its foot in the door with many universities. Don’t get me started on what it could do for the entertainment industry.
However, what I truly want to see is a multi-touch Mac. While the idea is still in the distant future, I can see it been an incredible possibility. For anyone who has used a Mac and/or iPhone, you know why the idea of combining them is exciting indeed.
#1
Craig Hockenberry → iconfactory.com
Actually, Glenn, you probably don’t want a multi-touch Mac:
http://furbo.org/2007/07/16/multi-touch-on-the-desktop/
I love touch interfaces, and am currently developing software for the iPhone. But don’t conflate the mobile and desktop environments: they have very unique and different requirements.
Your comment about the new trackpads is also off base: while they are handy shortcuts, those devices don’t feature direct manipulation. That’s a central component to a touch interface.
Take a look at the Starfire video to get a better understanding of the ergonomics involved:
http://www.asktog.com/starfire/
It’s going to be quite awhile before this stuff is ready for real work and not just TV or movies.
-ch
#2
Lasha → onefusedlife.com
Agreed, Apple knows better than anyone else what they have on their hands. It seems as if Apple’s secret plans are to head straight into touch interfaces and such, but at a very steady and careful pace, hence the iPhone and multitouch trackpads on their devices. It will take a long time for the world to migrate from keyboards and mice into full touch tech. For that matter, I believe that there will always be some form of tactility.
#3
Joe Jacobs → joejacobs.tumblr.com
Craig, Glenn didn’t write this post. Desktop Vibes is a group of writers. Don’t assume that Glenn writes all of this content; good or bad. I’m actually the author of this specific article.
Multi-touch technology is here, fully usable and completely capable of being implemented. The iPhone is a prime example. And as I mentioned, the device has been used on prime time TV! I realize that its not perfect, but it’s definitely usable.
As for the multi-touch trackpads, I wasn’t very far off base. While the trackpad does not involve direct input to the object, it does mimic the input involved. It’s a first step, as I was trying to point out.
Mark my words, within the next two years, Apple will produce a multi-touch Mac.
#4
Michael Mistretta → michaelmistretta.com
I kind of have to agree with Craig on this one. Have you ever tried to hold your hand and touch your screen for more than 5-10 minutes? It gets tiring real fast.
Multitouch is not meant to “replace” the current desktop user interfaces just as much as the mouse didn’t replace the keyboard with the Macintosh. They complimented each other.
While a full-fledged multi-touch interface works well in an iPhone or small portable device, it may not work well in a desktop or laptop computer.
I do believe that we will see some sort of Apple Multi-touch tablet later this year that uses multi-touch for the entire GUI. And Apple very well may brand this under the “Macintosh” name. But each device suits a different type of interface. As you can see from Windows Mobile devices, the mouse is not meant for a pocket-sized device. And a complete multi-touch interface is *not* meant for a desktop/laptop computer.